Advice to New and Incoming PhD Students

Some time ago, I sent a list of suggestions to new PhD students in the Department of Theology and Christian Philosophy. Most of the advice is contextual, and none of it should be taken as an absolute. However, I hope that at least some of the points might be of assistance to you as you navigate the first years of your doctoral program.

  1. Do your best to prepare for your studies before you even begin with your program. That will save you a lot of time. For example, read through books such as Jaroslav Pelikan’s 5-volume The Christian Tradition and Roger Olson’s The Journey of Modern Theology.

  2. As early as possible, master at least one of the major theologians: Augustine, Calvin, Barth, Bonhoeffer, R. Niebuhr, or Moltmann are possible options. Read 3-4 books of a theologian’s work, preferably twice. Spread your wings beyond the confines of evangelical and Adventist theology. Such immersion will reap huge benefits for years to come.

  3. Take classes from various professors. That will expose you to different teaching styles and competencies and give you a sense of who might be a good fit to serve as your advisor. Besides, your teachers might have a range of expertise that you are not even aware of. After all, given the curriculum restrictions, most of us can teach only a portion of our academic interests.

  4. Familiarize yourself early on with the respective comps bibliographies. It is never too early to start thinking about those exams.

  5. When it comes to choosing an advisor, always consider expertise, personality, and processes (i.e., how a professor actually works). In the best of circumstances, a chosen advisor would suit your needs on all three of those levels.

  6. Do not choose your advisor too early. You never know how things will work out precisely in terms of your topic and other matters. That is especially true if you did not have extensive exposure to the field of theological studies.

  7. Also, don’t feel committed to any professor as an advisor before you are clear about your research project. All of us are eager for you to find the best possible person to work with and won’t mind at all if the direction of your research interests or other factors leads you to select someone else.

  8. At the same time, do engage in informal conversations with all of the professors. Tell them about your ideas and ask for possible research topics. They will have a vantage point to offer you helpful suggestions.

  9. Here is my suggested timeline when it comes to choosing a research topic and an advisor:

    • During the first year or so, spread your wings and see whether a research field will crystallize itself. If you already have a specific topic in mind, see if your interests are either confirmed or redirected. Be open to providential nudges into directions that you might not have initially considered. If you feel certain, you could already move to the following stages.

    • During the second year, you should have a basic idea of what area or broad topic you want to work in. Use every opportunity to write papers that go in that general direction. If you are still not sure on that front, go and talk to various professors. They are usually excellent resources for soliciting research project ideas. Also, make use of PROQUEST Dissertations and Theses to get a sense of what doctoral students in other institutions are producing. Ideally, you would have your dissertation chair in place by then.

    • During the third year at the latest, you should already have your topic and basic research in place. Ideally, you would complete your proposal during your third year if not earlier. Do everything possible to have that under your belt before the comps.

  10. The sooner you decide on a topic and a provisional dissertation structure, the better. If for instance, you plan to have 4-5 chapters approximately 40-50 pages in length, you could submit research papers (if the classes allow it) toward those chapters. So, by the time you begin writing your dissertation, you could already have up to 150 pages of draft material. Of course, the planning would need to be done in consultation with your dissertation chair.

  11. Think of yourself as a future scholar who is trying to achieve a wide range of competencies. Your studies are not just about your dissertation. You will most likely be asked to teach on a wide range of topics, so expose yourself to classes and themes that are not in your immediate research area. As a college professor, I taught Adventist history, world religions, Christian Spirituality, research methods,…. You get the picture. Besides, you never know what will prove to be “useful.” In my case, some of the off-beat classes I took as a doctoral student ended up being the most formative ones.

  12. Arguably, your preparations for the comprehensive exams will be the most important aspect of your doctoral studies. They will enable you to lay a foundation and provide a repository of information that will stay with you for decades, informing your teaching and research.

  13. Don’t hesitate to contact scholars in other institutions, especially people interested in the kind of scholarly questions you are pursuing. Put your name out there. It is never too early to start networking. Whether you like it or not, it is a must. And by all means, present papers whenever you can. In effect, your job search begins the moment you begin your program.

  14. Keep in mind that your primary goal is being a teacher. Ask yourself, “Is this something that I would actually enjoy?” Loving theology is one thing; teaching religion to (often disinterested) Gen Zers is something quite different. It’s fantastic, but would you love it?

  15. Have a plan B. The job market is incredibly tight nowadays, so being open to various vocational tracks is incredibly helpful.

  16. Read journals in the educational guild, such as The Chronicle of Higher Education. (You have free access to it through your library account.) The more you understand current issues and trends in higher education, the better you will be prepared for your post-PhD life. Also, read books on teaching and such.

OK! So much for now. Let me know if you have any input on these and other matters.

Why Medical Schools Are More Impressive than Seminaries

Dear students,

One of Bonhoeffer’s major gripes during his stay in America concerned the unceasing prattling about “practical implications” that he encountered in his theology classes. He was dumbfounded by the students’s impatience to engage in serious theological discussions concerning, for example, Christology, and saw the automatic reflex towards the practical for what it often was—not an expression of spirituality and altruism, but rather one of superficiality and lack of virtue.

It was that biographical tidbit of Bonhoeffer’s life that came to mind as I read Stanley Hauerwas’s quip about medical schools being more morally impressive than divinity schools:

A person can come to divinity school today saying, “I am not really into Christology this year. I am really into relating. I would like to take more courses in CPE [Clinical Pastoral Education].” They are likely to be confirmed in that option by being told, “Right, take CPE, after all that is what ministry is— elating. Learn to be a wounded healer.”

Contrast that with a medical student who might say, “I am not really into anatomy this year. I am really into people. I would like to take another course in psychiatry.” They would be told, “We do not care what you are ‘into.’ Take anatomy or ship out.” That is real moral education if not formation. Why is medical education so morally superior to ministerial education? I think the answer is very simple. No one believes that an inadequately trained priest [or pastor] might damage their salvation; but people do believe that an inadequately trained doctor might hurt them” (Stanley Hauerwas, “Sinsick,” in Sin, Death, & the Devil, ed. by Carl E. Braaten and Robert W. Jenson, 9).

Food for thought, and then some!

Affectionately yours,
Dr. J.

9B0ACE7A-ED12-4378-9F53-69F0672F9FBC.jpg

Research and Deliberate Practice

Dear students,

You might not know this about me, but when I was young I really loved playing water polo. That is not as surprising as might sound given that the sport is very popular in my home country. In fact, Serbia and Croatia—both ex-Yugoslavia countries—have had a stronghold on the world championships and Olympic gold medals for some time now.

However, I am not here to write about the sport but about the training sessions we had to endure. As in other athletic endeavors, we spent most of the time not playing the game or even shooting the ball. We swam, had leg drills, then swam some more, and so on. It was all about fine-tuning our bodies, fine-tuning the underlying skills needed to thrive, or even just survive, in a competitive setting. (The sport is notoriously demanding.)

Of course, that will be nothing unusual to anyone who has been around sports (or music and arts for that matter). The basketball player who drills his free-throws, the soccer player who works on her tactics, the golf player who fine-tunes his swing—these and countless examples can be marshaled to illustrate the importance of deliberate practice (pace Anders Ericsson) for the mastery of any skill.

And so it is with research as well. I believe that the fine-tuning of our writing chops, for instance, should be an essential component of our daily research regiment. (I shared with you earlier the importance of having a ritual where you commit to having daily contact with your project, even if it is just 15 min. or so.) Here is a specific suggestion. Before you start with your writing session, spent at least 10 min. reading a book on writing. I believe that such a practice is beneficial not only for honing our prose, but also to get the juices going, so to speak. Besides, don’t we all need to excise the ponderous fatuousness of most of our academic writing? That passive-voice laden, convoluted, impersonal, disconnected verbiage that seeks to pass as expertise and scholarliness?

In any case, let me recommend you a couple of resources (of the many available) that could be of great help; each one them has been of tremendous benefit to me:

So, why not give it a try? If it doesn’t work for you, fine. Focus on some other aspects of research craftsmanship. If, on the other hand, you find some use for the advice—splendid! Drop me a note! Or better yet, share a trick or resource with me. There is always so much room to grow!

Affectionately yours,

Dr. J.

Progressive Extremism: The Power of Atomic Habits

Dear students,

A while back, I sent an email to PhD candidates in our department with the following suggestion: never lose touch with your project, even if it is just 15 minutes a day! However busy you are, however crazy your life is, check in with your writing,  5-6 times a week, even if ever so briefly. Don’t break the chain! (See, for example, the following piece.)

Two ideas from two authors that supplement that advice:

  1. Clear, Atomic Habits – Focus on lead measures (habits, processes) rather than lag measures (results). In other words, focus on the systems and strategies (as in the paragraph above) rather than goals. Embrace an identity (e.g., writer, scholar) rather than some future outcome (e.g., finishing the dissertation).

  2. Nir Eyal, the author of Indistractable – Adopt the philosophy of “progressive extremism.” Forget about the ideal of becoming a scholar overnight who writes hours every day. Decide on one thing, however minimal, that you will do for the rest of your life. (Again, the example above is a good place to start). Once something has become second nature, move it up a notch. And so on, and so on.

Nir Eyal explains how to break a bad habit. Try it and you will see the results. ►Special thanks to Tom Bilyeu for providing these amazing interviews: https:...

In any case, learning about habits formation and processes of productivity is one aspect of approaching scholarship as a craft. (More about that in the future.)

I am praying for your well-being and that of your families.

Affectionately yours,

Dr. J.

Write no Matter What

Dear students,

Some of you I had the pleasure of meeting, while others I know only by their names. I trust that you and your families are doing well in this moment of global crisis.

All of you are at different stages of your dissertation writing, a process that is often lonely, taxing, and disheartening. (I know that all too well!) One way to get a handle on these “demons” is to set aside regular time to hone your research tools and processes; to rethink and revise our strategies so that steady progress becomes a reality. 

With that in mind, I thought of checking in with you from time to time to share some tips. For instance, Rebecca Schuman, in one of her pieces for The Chronicle of Higher Education series on writing, suggests the following: “Summon 25 minutes of laser focus on your work, one to three times during your work day.”

I realize you may be thinking, “I can’t get any substantive writing/research done in 25 minutes!” Well I am staring at two books with my name on them that suggest it is possible. Why not try? What could it hurt? Sometime this week, when you’re in your office or workspace, do this:

  • Turn down the volume on your cellphone. Close your email program.

  • Close your eyes for two seconds and take a deep breath. Look a clock or set a timer and say aloud: “25 minutes. Go.”

  • Then, either free-write something related to what you’re working on, pull up a document and tinker with it, or read and take good, responsive notes.

  • After 25 minutes, stop and go back to whatever nonsense was occupying your day.

 That is so true! The absolute essential key is never to lose touch with your project, even if it is just 15 minutes a day. (Also see Bolker’s Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day). However busy you are, however crazy your life is, check in with your writing,  5-6 times a week, even if ever so briefly. Forget the idea of binge writing or waiting for some ideal time when you will have lots of free time. Instead, keep the juices flowing!

Stay safe and be of good cheer!

Yours affectionately,

Dr. J.