Life-Change Booklist

read-black-and-white-structure-board-keyboard-technology-536214-pxhere.com.jpg

In my post “Principles of Life-Change” I talk quite a bit about strategizing life-change, and how skill acquisition—information, experiential knowledge, mentorship, clarity, goals, planning, reviewing, etc.—is endemic to the idea of craft. In the light of such a sharpen-the-tools spirit, let me offer an off-the-cuff booklist that you may want to peruse in 2021. By “peruse” I actually mean absorb them if you happen to pick them up. I found all of them to be, well, life-changing.

  1. Cal Newport, Deep Work

  2. James Clear, Atomic Habits

  3. Wendy Wood, Good Habits, Bad Habits

  4. Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow

  5. Greg McKewon, Essentialism

  6. John Tierney and Roy Baumeister, Willpower

  7. Charles Duhigg, The Power of Habit

  8. Cal Newport, Digital Minimalism

  9. Kelly McGonigal, The Willpower Instinct

  10. Nir Eyal, Indistractable

  11. Amy Duckworth, Grit

  12. Charles Duhigg, Smarter, Faster, Better

Enjoy!

Principles of Life-Change: Podcast Series on New Year's Resolutions in a Bullet-Point Format

In my recent five-part podcast mini-series—the December 2, 2020 episode About those New Year's Wishes being the first one—I explore the issue of New Year’s resolutions as a moniker for the drama of human transformation. I don’t wish to repeat everything I said in that context except to provide a bullet-list of items discussed, with a few more added, to serve as a future reference point. (For sure, that will be my go-to list when things get hazy, and I will be updating it should new insights emerge. I also plan to consult it during my weekly reviews.) Understandably, this post is somewhat cryptic, but what I lose in specificity, I gain in brevity. Well, sort of. Actually, not really as far as brevity is concerned. 🙂

Perhaps just one additional caveat. Generally, I am not a fan of texts laced with hyperlinks. I find them distracting and unnecessarily bloated. In this case, however, the nature of the document merits some referencing. Meaning, its manifesto-like feel might call for a more studious and reflective reading, one that is ideally attempted in several takes over a period of time and in conversation with networked sources. I might be wrong in so thinking, but there it is.

So, here were the major themes and principles discussed:

  • The significance of kairos or critical moments as special visitations of grace. We should grab hold of those opportunities, those life-intersections when latent energies of the human spirit are on the move. All the usual spoofing of New Year’s resolutions aside, the change of the calendar year is a ritualized event with much potential if approached the right way. Why not make the best of it?

  • As a run-up to January 1, I suggested doing a life audit by answering four questions: What resolutions did I make in the past, and how did I fare with them? Where does my time regularly go? (Use a time tracker for one week at least. You will be surprised!) What are my greatest weaknesses? (Be very specific in putting them on paper.) What habits do I have? (Use a habit tracker for at least a week). Given that we are woefully obtuse when it comes to knowing ourselves, exercises in conscientization (pardon the term) are a must. All genuine change begins with some measure of self-knowledge.

  • Furthermore, clarify your core values, paying special attention to matters of identity. What would you like to achieve? Who would you like to be? In particular, what character traits would you like to possess? (I discuss my identity values here.) Exercise: write your own obituary based on who you are right now. What does your write-up reveal?

  • Procrastination often has to do with either lacking a clear sense of purpose or having self-doubt. Clarify the first, combat the second. If the cause is deep burnout, i.e., the result of accumulated stress, chronic tiredness, lack of planning, poor nutrition, overcommitment, etc., a more comprehensive life evaluation might be called for.

  • As Wendy Wood nicely describes it in her Good Habits, Bad Habits, there is a basic tension between cognitive and behavioral approaches in psychology. Their primary focus is on cognition and automatized routines, respectively. (OK, I am oversimplifying things, but such a basic typology does offer a helpful reference point.) Both have their role to play, of course. We plan, have goals, visualize, etc., and we need requisite habits that will sustain us in achieving those desired outcomes. The problem comes when either aspect is neglected.

  • These two forms of processing use different sets of neural circuitries that work independently of each other. The automatic processing is less energy-demanding, which partially explains why habits take over during “hot states” such a busyness, lethargy, tiredness, anxiety, and so on. (For a good clarifying resource, check out “Why Willpower Fails You,” including the issue of restraint bias.)

  • In so far as motivation rests on heightened psychological states, it will eventually evaporate. In that regard, Meg Robins is right when she says that “motivation is garbage.”

  • That being the case, do not rely on white-knuckled, will power-driven approaches to change. They will fail you. The goal is to move from relying on decisions to automaticity. (For an excellent resource on the topic, check out the Hidden Brain episode featuring Wendy Wood.) As William James famously put it in his The Principles of Psychology: “The more of the details of our daily life we can hand over to the effortless custody of automatism, the more our higher powers of mind will be set free for their own proper work.”

  • It might do well here to summarize the various strands so far by defining habit as “automaticity in lieu of conscious motivation” (Wood, 44). Also, and this is eye-opening, “habits are a kind of action that is relatively insensitive to reward.”

  • There is this illusion in connection with decision-making where the excitement about desired outcomes gives you the reward upfront. You already see yourself as having the desired physique, for instance, and that feels great. Of course, things will be way different once you commence on the journey. The initial excitement will be gone, the emerging habit will feel boring or hard, and you will enter a stage of motivational haziness. Don’t be tricked by the black hole of despondency. Persist, and discipline will bring you freedom—did you think I would skip on Jocko Willink?—as mastery invariably does.

  • That issue, in turn, connects to the “plateau of latent potential” problem. As James Clear notes, “in the early and middle stages of any quest, there is often a Valley of Disappointment. You expect to make progress in a linear fashion and it’s frustrating how ineffective changes can seem during the first days, weeks, and even months. It doesn’t feel like you are going anywhere. It’s a hallmark of any compounding process: the most powerful outcomes are delayed” (Atomic Habits, 20). We need to be ready for that.

  • That is why I spent time on the hot-cold empathy gap (an aspect of affective forecasting). It is a real challenge to envision future emotional states or life disturbances and the way they will affect even the best of resolutions. Nothing new here. There is a reason why the Devil tempts Jesus at the end of his forty-day fast.

  • The linked article in the paragraph above also notes the following: “Understand that you are going to be put in those situations where it will take a lot of willpower to act, so give your future self some assistance by planning how you will deal with temptations ahead of time.” One important strategy to aid us in that regard is to practice precommitment. As Tierney and Baumeister put it, “the essence of this strategy is to lock yourself into a virtuous path. You recognize that you’ll face terrible temptations to stray from the path, and that your willpower will weaken. So you make it impossible—or somehow unthinkably disgraceful or sinful—to leave the path. Precommitment is what Odysseus and his men used to get past the deadly songs of the Sirens” (151). Check out the stickK app or something along those lines as a possible option.

  • And that is why it is good to focus on regularity rather than on the amount of doing something. For instance, it is better to read every day irrespective of the duration than to set the number of books you want to read in a month. In so doing, you remove the friction of decision-making. And besides, you will almost certainly end up reading more.

  • Put differently, habits that are regular—preferably daily ones during set times—will take root the quickest. Like plants, habits flourish best with regular nourishment.

  • On the issue of friction, we drastically underestimate the importance of contexts for developing new habits. By “contexts,” I mean facets such as environment, cues, set times, and rituals. A formation-friendly context is one that removes frictions in respect to good habits (e.g., the desk cleaned the evening before, file opened on your computer, a favorite drink at hand, a specific time, etc., if we use the example of writing) and adds friction in respect to bad ones (e.g., the Freedom app set to start automatically for the duration of planned writing, etc.).

  • Of course, the significance of implementation intention cannot be overstated. The when, where, how often, and how long of making a decision needs to be crystal clear. (See step four in “How Habits Work,” or just Google about it.) Having an accountability partner is an added bonus.

  • Here important principles of habit-stacking and immediate rewards are crucial. (I talk about that from personal experience in my latest podcast episode “On Contexts and Rituals.”)

  • I am quite partial to the importance of mini-habits and the resulting suggestion: scale down your new habits to a minimum level (e.g., exercising 4 min. every day) where you can do them even during your most disruptive days.

  • Combine the mini-habits mentality with a streaks approach. An app such as Streaks or a simple wall calendar where you cross out days with a red Sharpie are good ways of doing so.

  • Also, take seriously the 1% rule, i.e., the commitment to tiny, regular improvements. The principle of compound interest is powerful in all domains of life.

  • Tie desired changes to your identity. James Clear writes: “Each habit is like a suggestion: ‘Hey, maybe this is who I am.’ If you finish a book, then perhaps you are the type of person who likes reading. If you go to the gym, then perhaps you are the type of person who likes exercise. If you practice playing the guitar, perhaps you are the type of person who likes music. Every action you take is a vote for the type of person you wish to become. No single instance will transform your beliefs, but as the votes build up, so does the evidence of your new identity” (Atomic Habits, 38).

  • With that in mind, I subscribe to the progressive (and sometimes radical) extremism as explained by Nir Eyal. As I wrote about it before, decide on one thing, however minimal, that you will do for the rest of your life. Once something has become second nature, move it up a notch. And so on, and so on.

  • At the same time, if something has a hold on you, a radical, cold-turkey break or detox might be needed. With me, it was sugar. Incrementalism didn’t help. I had to make a drastic change of never ever eating any added sugar again. Not only does this make things simpler for me—I find it way easier to say no to eating a piece of cake than having to say “no” to the second one—but as an addict, I need clear bright lines. And no, eating sugar in moderation will never be an option for me. (Again, restraint bias.)

  • A good place to start with resetting our lives is to start with a bottom-up approach (strategies, operation procedures, etc.) rather than a top-down one (visions, goals, etc.) While the second aspect is essential, you need first to tilt the soil, so to speak.

  • One excellent bottom-up strategy is to get a handle on our time more generally and time-management more specifically. In that regard, I highly recommend Cal Newport’s time-block planning approach. (For starters, see here and here).

  • From there, you take the next step to create clear morning and evening rituals, shut-down routines, weekly reviews, quarterly planning, and so on. I talk about it in my last episode of the mini-series. See also “Importance of Daily Rituals.

  • And then, perhaps, have a digital declutter in January or February. For those of you who believe in fasting and are Christians, perhaps you could combine the declutter with a Daniel Fast. Alternatively, experimenting with short-term water-only fasts (3-5 days) or some type of intermittent fasting will also yield unbelievable health and spiritual dividends. (On the question of fasting, Drs. Valter Longo, Jason Fung, and Michael Greger are important voices.)

  • In so doing, you will be most likely stumble upon some keystone habits that will have a ripple effect on your life. (See here and here on keystone habits.) Leverage them for all their potential!

  • Have a craftsmanship approach to life. That means at least three things. First, regularly think about strategies along the lines suggested above. Second, have regular (weekly, at least) after-action reports to review how you are doing. And third, remember that resolutions are not about immediate mastery but a constant refinement of the craft of living.

  • In that spirit, be realistic about how much to take on at any given time. As Tierney and Baumeister suggested, “focus on one project at a time. If you set more than one self-improvement goal, you may succeed for a while by drawing on reserves to power through, but that just leaves you more depleted and more prone to serious mistakes later” (37).

  • Keep in mind that there are no hard and fast rules. Although there some universal features of human nature, no one can tell us exactly what will work for us. We need to try, experiment, fail, and learn important lessons along the way. Remember, there is no stasis, no final arrival on this earth. That too is at the heart of the craft of living.

  • Finally, a spiritual coda that I hold on to with a verve: “I can do all things through Christ who gives me strength.”

PS: Let me just add that I have broached some of these issues in two of my YouTube episodes: “Life Lessons Learned I” and “Life Lessons Learned II.”

Peace and courage!

"Straying Afield of Oneself"—Foucault and the Craft of Living

path-walking-snow-winter-light-black-and-white-631608-pxhere.com.jpg

Let me begin with a few words from Michel Foucault’s The Uses of Pleasure:

As for what motivated me, it is quite simple…. It was curiosity—the only kind of curiosity, in any case, that is worth acting upon with a degree of obstinacy: not the curiosity that seeks to assimilate what it is proper for one to know, but that which enables one to get free of oneself. After all, what would be the value of the passion for knowledge if it resulted only in a certain amount of knowledgeableness and not, in one way or another and to the extent possible, in the knower’s straying afield of himself?… What is philosophy today—philosophical activity, I mean—if it is not the critical work that thought brings to bear on itself?… The essay—which should be understood as the assay or test by which, in the game of truth, one undergoes changes… is the living substance of philosophy, at least if we assume that philosophy is still what it was in times past, i.e., an “ascesis,” askesis, an exercise of oneself in the activity of thought.

There are many moving balls here, but what strikes me as deeply pertinent is his definition of philosophy as a type of askesis, “an exercise of oneself in the activity of thought”; a motto of the Craft of Living blog. More than simply striving to be informative, the posts are “athletic” feats of sorts, a type of spiritual calisthenics in the form of probing, experimenting, crafting, and holding myself accountable. They are implicit attempts to work on myself as myself, or, the appropriate Foucault’s gratifying turn of phrase, to foster the “knower’s straying afield of himself.”

I won’t go into what all that Foucault is after here, except to note his correct assumption that true philosophy amounts to a craft, an art of letting go of the self; the illusionary, obstinate, narcissistic, false, incongruous, lazy, bored self. A genuine Christian philosophy will, of course, understand such self-renunciation—the “I no longer live” aspect—entirely in christological terms.

The One Practice that Makes all the Difference

autumn-Maple-Leaves-black-and-white-photography.jpg

Most of the arguments in Arthur C. Brook’s NYT article “Choose to Be Grateful. It Will Make You Happier” are well-known givens: “acting grateful can actually make you grateful”; “acting happy, regardless of feelings, coaxes one’s brain into processing positive emotions”; “choosing to focus on good things makes you feel better than focusing on bad things”; “choosing gratitude can also bring out the best in those around us”; and “give thanks especially when you don’t feel it.”

Them being a provenance of common sense doesn’t make these truisms less significant, though. On the contrary, as discussed in one of my CL episodes, fundamental life insights often come to us in trite packaging, the kind of asininities splashed on mugs and car decals. (I briefly refer to this in a previous blog post.) Paradoxically so, however, their significance is inversely proportional to their, at times, saccharine vibe. A point of note I would do well remembering, to be honest.

But I want to raise another point, one that recent experiences have pressed upon me with renewed clarity. It concerns the settled conviction that gratitude should be regarded as a meta-tool, a craft of living practice of cardinal significance. How so? Quite simply, I can think of few other interventions that have such an instantaneous effect on my “states,” i.e., the amalgams of cognitive processes and affective “feels” at any given moment. Despondency, anger, frustration, jadedness, doubt, and resentment—these and other phantoms dissipate, more or less so, in the face of gratitude. Astonishing, really! Self-analysis and visualizations play but a second fiddle in terms of their transformative impact, as do changes in body language, Amy Cuddy’s passionate advocacy notwithstanding. In my book, anyway.

I know, nothing new is being shared here. Both common wisdom and psychology have underscored this point repeatedly: our language structures reality and the sense of subjective well-being. Nevertheless, I continue to be amazed at the potency of this pharmakon, this elixir of the highest order. Whenever I remember not to push directly against my “states” but meet them instead in an aikido-like fashion with the subtle grace of gratitude, my soul registers begin to change. Partially, at least. And I’ll take that any time of the day.

So, I embrace St. Paul’s adage to “give thanks in all circumstances” (1. Thess. 5:18) as my life philosophy, with gusto commensurate to a recovering cynic at that.

"The Unimportance of Practically Everything"

screen-apple-black-and-white-plant-fruit-wind-545043-pxhere.com.jpg

Just a reminder that you can sign up for my newsletter in order to get the latest blog posts directly into your inbox. Cheers!

I don't know exactly why I have this pronounced minimalism tic. It must be connected to my personality somehow, I suppose. I just love getting rid of extraneous things. A house bubbling over with trinkets, a bursting closet, a work desk buried under an avalanche of papers—the stuff of nightmares! Whatever the reason behind my obsession might be, OCD tendencies and such, the image of pairing down, the prospect of Marie Kondoing my life—that is deeply satisfying. I liken it to the kind of pleasure you get from squeezing slime if my daughter's bliss in so doing is any indication. OK, the analogy is a bit strained, but you get the point.

To that end, I distinctly remember my dad telling me a story many years ago he found in an adventurer's autobiography. I don't know the particulars, but it concerned someone who sold off everything as he was about to embark on an around-the-world voyage with his sailing boat. The night before embarking on his adventure, he lay in his bed in a hotel room, feeling the liberty of material divestment. For some strange reason, I always connected with that imagery of existential “lightness.” (My usage of the term here should not be confused with Milan Kundera’s definition of the same.)

I suppose that is one of the reasons why I am such a sucker for the minimalism industry. I swallow that stuff hook, line, and sinker. (I am writing this in anticipation of the new documentary by the Minimalists. See below.) But more importantly, it explains why essentialism is one of my core identity values, and why—to get the theme going—Greg McKeown's Essentialism has a vaunted space on my craft of living bookshelf. I could go on quoting him for quite some time, but for this occasion, a couple of quotes will suffice:

81WSjTD7HLL.jpg

The way of the Essentialist means living by design, not by default. Instead of making choices reactively, the Essentialist deliberately distinguishes the few from the trivial many, eliminates the nonessentials, and then removes obstacles so the essential things have clear, smooth passage. In other words, Essentialism is a disciplined, systematic approach for determining where our highest point of contribution lies, then making execution of those things almost effortless. [7]

Essentialism is about creating a system for handling the closet of our lives. This is not a process you undertake once a year, once a month, or even once a week, like organizing your closet. It is a discipline you apply each and every time you are faced with a decision about whether to say yes or whether to politely decline. It’s a method for making the tough trade-off between lots of good things and a few really great things. It’s about learning how to do less but better so you can achieve the highest possible return on every precious moment of your life. [19]

The overwhelming reality is: we live in a world where almost everything is worthless and a very few things are exceptionally valuable. As John Maxwell has written, “You cannot overestimate the unimportance of practically everything.” [45]

All this is merely whetting my appetite, and one cannot but be tempted to extemporize on these insights at some length. And I certainly shall do on these pages, committed that I feel to the importance of this theme. In the meantime, cheers!

Guest Post: A Friend's Reply

0_PHmCKVVYwRLsJyJH.jpeg

A friend and student of mine shared with me the following response to my post on Marcus Aurelius. Its gracious and probing manner deserves to be posted in full. Thank you, Guilherme!

I have never read Meditations, but this post has motivated me to get that audio version and listen to it. That quote you provided is an inviting sample: “... A personality in balance ... Neither rash nor hesitant—or bewildered, or at a loss. Not obsequious—but not aggressive or paranoid either.” Hopefully, I can learn some things from Marcus Aurelius’ remarks on people who impacted him, which I can then put into practice, among other things, as I reflect on what I should do with my life.

There are a number of good things in your reflection that can be further unpacked. Maybe you could do a podcast episode on Marcus Aurelius as part of your What I Have Learned From ... series. In fact, maybe you could even write a book with that title at some point.

I appreciate your call to be thankful for the people in our lives. I also believe it could be interesting to explore the interplay between the emotions of gratitude and admiration in one’s engagement with moral exemplars.

Your statement that “recollecting virtuous people might be more valuable than any ethical theory” may be welcomingly humbling to scholars. While you are definitely not dismissing the study of ethical theory, you are touching on a point that should become clearer the more one thinks about it. In a sense, this reality is liberating. On the other hand, the statement is itself a theoretical reflection on how people exercise moral agency, that is, that a moral agent’s reflection upon the lives of people he or she admires may be more important than that agent’s comprehension of how he or she exercises moral agency. While theory is helpful, it is definitely not primary.

Thanks again for sharing. Have a good week!

Guilherme

How Marcus Aurelius Taught me Gratitude and Moral Mindfulness

idea_v2-gettyimages-966211040.jpg

In the past, whenever I would crack open Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations, I would instinctively skip Book 1 (“Debts and Lessons”). I would repeatedly dismiss it as a perfunctory foreword, listing that it does all the people that impacted him throughout his life. OK, good, nice, touching, let’s move on. It took an audiobook listening of the same to disabuse me of my ignorance. (It must have been Richard Armitage’s beguiling voice that did it. You have to get that version.) As I allowed the cadence of Aurelius’ gratitude to roll over me, I finally understood what that chapter was about:

  1. Good people that come across our path are one the life’s greatest gifts. That ought to occasion unceasing gratitude.

  2. Moral exemplars are essential in crafting our identity values and aspirations.

  3. Not one person can embody all the potentials of human goodness transformed by grace.

  4. Remembering and recollecting virtuous people might be more valuable than any ethical theory, including a theory of virtue.

  5. Such recollecting needs to be frequent.

There is nothing here that a Christian needs to object to, including the lessons that Aurelius learned from Maximus:

Self-control and resistance to distractions. Optimism in adversity—especially illness. A personality in balance: dignity and grace together. Doing your job without whining. Other people’s certainty that what he said was what he thought, and what he did was done without malice. Never taken aback or apprehensive. Neither rash nor hesitant—or bewildered, or at a loss. Not obsequious—but not aggressive or paranoid either.

Right!

Here, then, is a good project for us, to be completed at some point in the near future. Our personal “Debt and Lessons” chapter to ground us in life, foster gratitude, and dispel any lingering existential rut.

The Importance of Bright Lines: When Clean Breaks Might Be Necessary

geotagged-nevada-overton-Stewarts-Point-united-states-usa-1542243-pxhere.com.jpg

Anyone dealing with addiction or strongly entrenched habits realizes sooner or later that gradualist approaches might not do the trick. Of course, only we can know whether that is the case with us. Personally, I have benefited both from incrementalist and radical gestures, the latter coming to the fore when more moderate strategies failed to do their job. In that regard, I found the concept of “bright lines” that Tierney and Baumeister mention in their book Willpower incredibly helpful. Bright lines, on their terms,

are clear, simple, unambiguous rules. You can’t help but notice when you cross a bright line. If you promise yourself to drink or smoke ‘moderately,’ that’s not a bright line. It’s a fuzzy boundary with no obvious point at which you go from moderation to excess. Because the transition is so gradual and your mind is so adept at overlooking your own peccadilloes, you may fail to notice when you’ve gone too far. So you can’t be sure you’re always going to follow the rule to drink moderately. In contrast, zero tolerance is a bright line: total abstinence with no exceptions anytime. It’s not practical for all self-control problems—a dieter cannot stop eating all food—but it works well in many situations. Once you’re committed to following a bright-line rule, your present self can feel confident that your future self will observe it, too. And if you believe that the rule is sacred—a commandment from God, the unquestionable law of a higher power—then it becomes an especially bright line. You have more reason to expect your future self to respect it, and therefore your belief becomes a form of self-control: a self-fulfilling mandate. I think I won’t, therefore I don’t.

Eric Clapton discovered that bright line in one moment at Hazelden, and he appreciated its power once again when he chaired an AA meeting not long after the death of his son. He spoke about the third of the twelve steps—handing your will over to the care of a higher power—and told the group how his compulsion to drink had vanished the instant he got down on his knees at Hazelden and asked for God’s help. From then on, he told them, he never doubted he would have the will to remain sober, not even on the day his son died. After the meeting, a woman came up to him. “You’ve just taken away my last excuse to have a drink,” she told him. “I’ve always had this little corner of my mind which held the excuse that, if anything were to happen to my kids, then I’d be justified in getting drunk. You’ve shown me that’s not true.” Upon hearing her, Clapton realized that he had found the best way to honor the memory of his son. Whatever you call his gift to that woman—social support, faith in God, trust in a higher power, a bright line—it left her with the will to save herself. (185-186)

I can relate to these words, viscerally so.